<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Logitech Portable Webcam C905</title>
	<atom:link href="http://photographyuser.com/logitech-portable-webcam-c905/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://photographyuser.com/logitech-portable-webcam-c905/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=logitech-portable-webcam-c905</link>
	<description>Digital Camera Deals And Basic Photography Information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2011 15:59:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: H. Wang</title>
		<link>http://photographyuser.com/logitech-portable-webcam-c905/comment-page-1/#comment-1259</link>
		<dc:creator>H. Wang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 18:51:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photographyuser.com/?p=778#comment-1259</guid>
		<description>it has very good picture quality, but the build in microphone doesn&#039;t seems to work. so i have to buy anther micro. 
Rating: 4 / 5</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><p>it has very good picture quality, but the build in microphone doesn&#8217;t seems to work. so i have to buy anther micro.<br />
Rating: 4 / 5</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: N. Ethen</title>
		<link>http://photographyuser.com/logitech-portable-webcam-c905/comment-page-1/#comment-1258</link>
		<dc:creator>N. Ethen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 16:37:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photographyuser.com/?p=778#comment-1258</guid>
		<description>I would not recommend ordering this from Amazon as the box the product was in (not the bigger, amazon box) was opened and was not in good shape at all.
Rating: 3 / 5</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><p>I would not recommend ordering this from Amazon as the box the product was in (not the bigger, amazon box) was opened and was not in good shape at all.<br />
Rating: 3 / 5</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack T. Warner</title>
		<link>http://photographyuser.com/logitech-portable-webcam-c905/comment-page-1/#comment-1257</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack T. Warner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 14:41:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photographyuser.com/?p=778#comment-1257</guid>
		<description>When I got this product it didn&#039;t work - absolutely no response from 4 different PCs.  Oh well!!
Rating: 1 / 5</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><p>When I got this product it didn&#8217;t work &#8211; absolutely no response from 4 different PCs.  Oh well!!<br />
Rating: 1 / 5</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J. Sack</title>
		<link>http://photographyuser.com/logitech-portable-webcam-c905/comment-page-1/#comment-1256</link>
		<dc:creator>J. Sack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 12:57:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photographyuser.com/?p=778#comment-1256</guid>
		<description>On a new desktop computer with a broadband internet connection, the quality of even this upper-end webcam is not acceptable.  The only plus I see with this product is that you don&#039;t get the rounded edges of the image that you would associate with webcams in general.  Still, with long lag times, sound that is delayed, and fuzzy picture quality, I won&#039;t bother looking into using webcam technology for at least a few more years.  Unless the parties on each end have good lighting (more light shining into your face than behind you is the key), the latest and fastest computers, fast internet speeds with few or no people downloading in your neighborhood, and high end cameras, the webcam experience is still downright brutal.  And even if you do have all this, it still is in the beginning stages.  Having said all of this, I do not think this is mainly a manufacturer issue, but more a technology issue.  
Rating: 1 / 5</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><p>On a new desktop computer with a broadband internet connection, the quality of even this upper-end webcam is not acceptable.  The only plus I see with this product is that you don&#8217;t get the rounded edges of the image that you would associate with webcams in general.  Still, with long lag times, sound that is delayed, and fuzzy picture quality, I won&#8217;t bother looking into using webcam technology for at least a few more years.  Unless the parties on each end have good lighting (more light shining into your face than behind you is the key), the latest and fastest computers, fast internet speeds with few or no people downloading in your neighborhood, and high end cameras, the webcam experience is still downright brutal.  And even if you do have all this, it still is in the beginning stages.  Having said all of this, I do not think this is mainly a manufacturer issue, but more a technology issue.<br />
Rating: 1 / 5</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M. Mohamed</title>
		<link>http://photographyuser.com/logitech-portable-webcam-c905/comment-page-1/#comment-1255</link>
		<dc:creator>M. Mohamed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 10:29:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photographyuser.com/?p=778#comment-1255</guid>
		<description>I bought the Quickcam Pro from him and he ships me the Quickcam Deliux so I don&#039;t trust this seller at all!!!
Rating: 1 / 5</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><p>I bought the Quickcam Pro from him and he ships me the Quickcam Deliux so I don&#8217;t trust this seller at all!!!<br />
Rating: 1 / 5</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

